Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/17/2000
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 749 A.2d 921
- 2000 Pa. Super. 78
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pension benefits accruing prior to second marriage to same wife not subject to division
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Melvin, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bower v. BowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 96×
- Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 84×
- Ruth v. RuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 73×
- Major v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-18· cited 32×
- Estep v. EstepSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-13· cited 31×
- Berrington v. BerringtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-09· cited 27×
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-13· cited 27×
- Anthony v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-07· cited 22×
- Estep v. EstepSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-01· cited 21×
- Conrad v. ConradSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 11×
- Barrett v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-28· cited 5×
- Bastion v. BastionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.