Mullen v. Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the United States is immune from suit unless Congress has expressly waived the defense of sovereign immunity by statute.”
• “[T]he United States has not consented to be sued for monetary damages based on a constitutional violation[.]”
• “[T]he United States has not consented to be sued for monetary damages based on a constitutional violation[.]”
• “[T]he United States has not consented to be sued for monetary damages based on a constitutional violation[.]”
• “[A]n argument in a dispositive motion that the opponent fails to address in an opposition may be deemed conceded.” (alteration in original) (quoting Rosenblatt v. Fenty, 734 F. Supp. 2d 21, 22 (D.D.C. 2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).