Maher & Associates, Inc. v. Quality Cabinets

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “ultimate objective for a court of review in construing the meaning of a statute is to ascertain the true meaning and intent of the legislature”
• interpreting the Sales Representative Act (820 ILCS 120/2 (West 1992)), and explaining that the difference between “void” and “void against public policy” was merely semantic
• the Restatement is a guide for courts, “not black-letter law to be upheld against all other considerations”
• “Whether the terms of a written contract are modified by acts or conduct is a question for the trier of fact.”
• “Whether the terms of a written contract are modified by acts or conduct is a question of fact for the trier of fact.”
• “A contract is validly modified if the party which did' not propose the changes is shown to acquiesce in the modification through a course of conduct consistent with acceptance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).