Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. AB Volvo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court will enforce the parties’ contractual terms to the letter
• stating that “a defendant may have a privilege to compete that defeats an action for intentional interference with prospective business advantage”
• declaring contract lan- guage permitting dealer agreement to be terminated at any time with- out cause to be unambiguous
• remanding case to consider parties’ dispute about whether Volvo’s rebranding of Samsung excavators amounted to an unlawful discontinuation of goods covered by franchise agreement
• “[F]or reasons not apparent from the record, the district court never ruled on the applicability of the ... Maine statute[ ].”
• provision providing parties the unfettered right to terminate contract was not ambiguous for purposes of invoking covenant of good faith and fair dealing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).