Skip to main content
· 12/18/1997

FIRST NAT. BANK OF SPRINFIELD v. Malpractice Research, Inc.

Citations

  • 688 N.E.2d 1179
  • 179 Ill. 2d 353
  • 228 Ill. Dec. 202
  • 70 A.L.R. 5th 759
  • 1997 Ill. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring contract void where courts had strongly condemned the use of contingent fee contracts for witness finders
  • quantum meruit unavailable where subject matter of underlying contingent fee agreement held unenforceable as being against public policy
  • quantum meruit unavailable where subject matter of underlying contingent fee agreement held unenforceable as being against public policy
  • contract providing contingency fee to expert witnesses was void as against public policy, and thus payment for work performed in furtherance thereof is prohibited in quantum meruit
  • a contingency-fee agreement with an expert-search firm was unenforceable
  • a contingency-fee agreement with an expert-search firm was unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.