· 12/18/1997
FIRST NAT. BANK OF SPRINFIELD v. Malpractice Research, Inc.
Citations
- 688 N.E.2d 1179
- 179 Ill. 2d 353
- 228 Ill. Dec. 202
- 70 A.L.R. 5th 759
- 1997 Ill. LEXIS 481
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declaring contract void where courts had strongly condemned the use of contingent fee contracts for witness finders
- quantum meruit unavailable where subject matter of underlying contingent fee agreement held unenforceable as being against public policy
- quantum meruit unavailable where subject matter of underlying contingent fee agreement held unenforceable as being against public policy
- contract providing contingency fee to expert witnesses was void as against public policy, and thus payment for work performed in furtherance thereof is prohibited in quantum meruit
- a contingency-fee agreement with an expert-search firm was unenforceable
- a contingency-fee agreement with an expert-search firm was unenforceable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.