Skip to main content
· 12/12/2005

Mahamat v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 430 F.3d 1281
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27098
  • 2005 WL 3367060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “insofar as [the petitioner] argues that the BIA should have certified his case for review under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(c),” the court “lack[s] jurisdiction”
  • holding that “insofar as [the petitioner] argues that the BIA should have certified his case for review under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(c),” the court “lack[s] jurisdiction”
  • “For an untimely claim to receive the benefit of equitable tolling, an alien must demonstrate . . . that [he] has exercised due diligence in pursuing the case during the period the alien seeks to toll.” (ellipsis and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Porfilio, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.