Magill v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that NRS 624.320 does not bar an unlicensed contractor's unjust enrichment claim based on the defendant's fraud
• holding that NRS 624.320 does not bar an unlicensed contractor's unjust enrichment claim based on the defendant's fraud
• recognizing that NRCP 54(c) requires, “that in a contested case the judgment is to be based on what has been proved rather than what has been pleaded”
• recognizing that NRCP 54(c) requires, \that in a contested case the judgment is to be based on what has been proved rather than what has been pleaded\
• recognizing that NRS 624.320 essentially nullifies contracts with unlicensed contractors
• recognizing that NRS 624.320 essentially nullifies contracts with unlicensed contractors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).