· 7/30/1991
Magic Wand, Inc. v. Rdb, Inc.
Citations
- 940 F.2d 638
- 19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1551
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16692
- 1991 WL 138498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the certificate of registration.”
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of 17 Ser No. 77099785 registration.”
- “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Michel, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.