Skip to main content
· 7/30/1991

Magic Wand, Inc. v. Rdb, Inc.

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 638
  • 19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1551
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16692
  • 1991 WL 138498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration.”
  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the certificate of registration.”
  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of [goods or] services set forth in the [application or] certificate of 17 Ser No. 77099785 registration.”
  • “[A] proper genericness inquiry focuses on the description of services set forth in the [application or] certificate of registration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Michel, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.