Skip to main content
· 1/3/1990

Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corporation

Citations

  • 892 F.2d 1576
  • 13 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1444
  • 1990 WL 106
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assessing descriptiveness and genericness by looking at how a consumer would perceive the mark “in connection with the products”
  • “travel care” is merely descriptive in light of, among other evidence, advertisements using the term descriptively
  • “travel care” is merely descriptive in light of, among other evidence, advertisements using the term descriptively
  • the mark must be considered in context, i.e., in connection with the goods
  • testimony of competitor's president of generic use by competitor
  • The term “travel care” was held to be at least descriptive based not upon a consideration of the meanings of the individual words “travel” and “care,” but rather upon the fact that the term “travel care” as a whole had been used in a descriptive or perhaps generic manner.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dumbauld, Newman, Rich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.