Skip to main content
· 4/28/1992

The Loglan Institute, Inc. v. The Logical Language Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 962 F.2d 1038
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 6443
  • 22 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1531
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8382
  • 1992 WL 83070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the public interest in a cancellation proceeding to rid the register of a generic mark”
  • because “Chablis” has some geographic significance does not establish how American consumers of wine perceive it
  • summary judgment of no literal infringement affirmed under the clearly erroneous standard of review
  • “The Board did not err in declining to apply [equitable] defenses [in a cancellation proceeding], as the public interest . . . to rid the register of [an ineligible mark] transcends them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plager, Skelton, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.