Magasouba v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that consideration of “fact-based challenges to the withholding and CAT rulings,” such as “the immigration judge’s credibility assessments, evidentiary rulings, and other factual determinations” are beyond the court’s limited jurisdiction under § 1252(a)(2)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).