· 12/6/2006
Daniel Valencia-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Citations
- 469 F.3d 1319
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29867
- 2006 WL 3499949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a res judicata argument because the alien had not obtained a prior “final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action”
- finding no impermissible retroactive effect in the denial of pre-IIRIRA relief because the petitioner had not been in the United States long enough to qualify for the relief at the time of IIRIRA’s passage
- “The criteria for the application of res judicata ... are that there be a final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action.” (emphasis in original)
- “The criteria for the application of res judicata . . . are that there be a final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action.” (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Tashima, Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.