Skip to main content
· 12/6/2006

Daniel Valencia-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Citations

  • 469 F.3d 1319
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29867
  • 2006 WL 3499949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a res judicata argument because the alien had not obtained a prior “final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action”
  • finding no impermissible retroactive effect in the denial of pre-IIRIRA relief because the petitioner had not been in the United States long enough to qualify for the relief at the time of IIRIRA’s passage
  • “The criteria for the application of res judicata ... are that there be a final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action.” (emphasis in original)
  • “The criteria for the application of res judicata . . . are that there be a final judgment, rendered on the merits in a separate action.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Tashima, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.