Fredy Paul Albillo-Figueroa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 18 U.S.C. § 472, which requires an 6180 MORALES-ALEGRIA v. GONZALES intent to defraud but does not mention “knowledge” of the fal- sity of the document, requires the latter
• “Th[e] requisite knowledge and intent to defraud is sufficient to make [the] conviction ... one that is ‘related to’ the act of counterfeiting itself.”
• the “requisite knowledge and intent to defraud is sufficient to make a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 472 one that is ‘related to’ the act of counterfeiting itself”
• the “requisite knowledge and intent to defraud is sufficient to make a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 472 one that is ‘related to’ the act of counterfeiting itself”
• reciting same three required elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).