Skip to main content

Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 810 A.2d 643
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 327
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reservation by mortgagee of access to the courts for itself to the exclusion of mortgagor unconscionable absent any \business realities\ compelling such a provision in arbitration agreement
  • holding that reservation by mortgagee of access to the courts for itself to the exclusion of mortgagor unconscionable absent any \business realities\ compelling such a provision in arbitration agreement
  • abrogated by Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp., 592 Pa. 323, 925 A.2d 115 (2007)
  • abrogated by Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp., 592 Pa. 323, 925 A.2d 115 (2007)
  • abrogated by Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp., 925 A.2d 115 (Pa. 2007)
  • contracts of adhesion are not unconscionable unless terms unreasonably favor drafter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Johnson, Joyce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

88 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.