Skip to main content
· 11/16/2007

Gaffer Insurance v. Discover Reinsurance Co.

Citations

  • 936 A.2d 1109
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 339
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whether, under the terms of the parties’ agreement, the “parties are required to submit their dispute to arbitration – is strictly one of contract interpretation”
  • “[A] preferred contract interpretation ascribes under all circumstances the most reasonable, probable, and natural conduct to the parties.”
  • “[A] preferred contract interpretation ascribes under all circumstances the most reasonable, probable, and natural conduct to the parties.”
  • “[t]he contract must be interpreted as a whole, and an interpretation that gives effect to all of the contract’s provisions is preferred.”
  • contract language that one of the parties “will submit to the jurisdiction” of particular courts is consistent with agreement to arbitrate and is properly construed as providing a judicial forum for compelling and enforcing arbitration
  • “[R]egardless of whether the contract is governed by federal or state arbitration law, we apply general -9- TM CONSTRUCTION, INC. V. MARCO CONTRACTORS, INC. Opinion of the Court principles of Pennsylvania contract law to interpret the parties' agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Klein, and McCaffery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.