Skip to main content

Lyles v. State

Citations

  • 742 So. 2d 842
  • 1999 WL 770713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court committed fundamental error where it gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte action which benefitted the State, i.e., reopening the probation revocation hearing and ordering the probationer to submit to fingerprinting
  • finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by sua sponte ordering defendant's fingerprints and bifurcating hearing to allow additional testimony
  • finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by sua sponte ordering defendant’s fingerprints and bifurcating hearing to allow additional testimony
  • holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he \gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State\
  • holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he “gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State”
  • holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he “gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.