District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/15/1999
Lyles v. State
Citations
- 742 So. 2d 842
- 1999 WL 770713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court committed fundamental error where it gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte action which benefitted the State, i.e., reopening the probation revocation hearing and ordering the probationer to submit to fingerprinting
- finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by sua sponte ordering defendant's fingerprints and bifurcating hearing to allow additional testimony
- finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by sua sponte ordering defendant’s fingerprints and bifurcating hearing to allow additional testimony
- holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he \gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State\
- holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he “gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State”
- holding trial judge in a probation revocation hearing committed fundamental error where he “gave the appearance of partiality by taking sua sponte actions which benefitted the State”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-07· cited 38×
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 15×
- McFadden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-13· cited 14×
- J.L.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 10×
- Seago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-06· cited 8×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-06· cited 8×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-18· cited 7×
- Padalla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-04· cited 6×
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 6×
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-15· cited 6×
- DiGiovanni v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-05· cited 4×
- M.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-09· cited 3×
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27· cited 3×
- D.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23· cited 2×
- Kirkpatrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-23· cited 2×
- M.W. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-30· cited 2×
- Ronnie Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-01· cited 1×
- Valley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-09· cited 1×
- JLD v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-30
- DW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sparks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-30· cited 37×
- McFadden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-28· cited 34×
- J. F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26· cited 30×
- Fitzhugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-22· cited 14×
- Dees v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-04-20· cited 12×
- K. K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-18· cited 6×
- Burton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.