Skip to main content

Lee v. State

Citations

  • 789 So. 2d 1105
  • 2001 WL 686604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing where judge suggested to prosecutor, after he finished questioning witness, to have witness identify defendant’s scars and tattoos on his forearm for the jury
  • reversing because the trial judge suggested questions to the prosecutor about identifying marks on the defendant after “the prosecutor had indicated that direct examination of the witness was concluded, [and] the trial court sua sponte called a sidebar”
  • trial court suggested a line of questioning to the prosecution with regard to identifying marks on the defendant’s body
  • trial court suggested a line of questioning to the prosecution with regard to identifying marks on the defendant's body
  • \The law in Florida expressly prohibits a judge from becoming an advocate for either party's position.\
  • where the defense was misidentification, the trial court instructed the prosecutor to ask a witness to identify the defendant’s tattoos after the prosecutor had not done so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damoorgian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.