Skip to main content
· 3/4/2005

Padalla v. State

Citations

  • 895 So. 2d 1251
  • 2005 WL 491400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state appellate court can review a disqualification claim based on due process for first time on appeal
  • noting it is “customary ... that the matter be heard on remand before a different judge”
  • “In the present case, the trial court assumed the role of the prosecutor and, in so doing, committed fundamental error.”
  • trial court questioned the state’s witnesses during a probation revocation hearing without the prosecutor having done so, generating the evidence which the court used to find that the defendant violated his probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salcines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.