State Ex Rel. McClanahan v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a challenge to a circuit court's ruling on a motion to disqualify is appropriately brought through a petition for prohibition
• recognizing that a challenge to a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to disqualify is appropriately brought through a petition for prohibition
• recognizing that a challenge to a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to disqualify is appropriate through an original proceeding brought before this court
• holding that once former client establishes attorney is representing individual in substantially related matter, presumption exists that former client divulged confidential information to attorney
• recognizing that a challenge to a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to disqualify is appropriately brought through a petition for prohibition
• holding that proof of a Rule 1.9(a) violation “requires an analysis of the facts, circumstances, and legal issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).