Skip to main content

Lydon v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 409 N.E.2d 745
  • 381 Mass. 356
  • 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant convicted at initial bench trial had no right to review of sufficiency of evidence prior to a de nova jury trial
  • “If there is a valid double jeopardy claim, it should be dealt with before, rather than after, the second trial”
  • defendant convicted at initial bench trial had no right to review of sufficiency of evidence prior to a de nova jury trial
  • valid double jeopardy claim “should be dealt with before . . . trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lydon v. Commonwealth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.