Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/30/1976

Ludwig v. Massachusetts

Citations

  • 427 U.S. 618
  • 96 S. Ct. 2781
  • 49 L. Ed. 2d 732
  • 1976 U.S. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that conviction after a bench trial may have adverse collateral consequences for a defendant
  • noting that conviction after a bench trial may have adverse collateral consequences for a defendant
  • recognizing the similarity between failure to appeal to de novo jury trial and waiving the right to trial by jury under the two-tier system employed by Massachusetts
  • \holding\ in Apodaca was that \the jury's verdict need not be unanimous\
  • affirming the constitutionality of a two-tier system where, after a conviction is entered in a bench trial, a de novo jury trial is available as of right
  • “holding” in Apodaca was that “the jury’s verdict need not be unanimous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ludwig v. Massachusetts

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.