Luster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in order for an object to be deemed in plain view, three elements must be met: “(1) the initial intrusion of the police must be lawful; (2) the police must ‘inadvertently’ discover the incriminating evidence; (3
• providing that officers may SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 OO 1947A 4EfO-' 11T seize objects not specified in a valid warrant if (1) their initial intrusion was lawful, (2) they inadvertently discover the evidence, and (3
• providing that officers may SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 OO 1947A 4EfO-' 11T seize objects not specified in a valid warrant if (1) their initial intrusion was lawful, (2) they inadvertently discover the evidence, and (3) it is readily apparent that the items are evidence of a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ford v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 14×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• Texas v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
• Horton v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
• Koza v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 99×
• Johnson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-12-30· cited 13×