Lewis v. DUFRAIN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that claims alleging subornation of testimony and ineffective assistance of trial counsel, both of which initially were raised in two C.P.L. § 440.10 motions, were not exhausted because the petitioner failed to request leave to appeal the denial of those motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).