Skip to main content
· 12/23/2002

Luminella v. Marcocci

Citations

  • 814 A.2d 711
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 410
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, a provision in child custody order requiring mother to undergo random drug testing did not violate reasonableness requirement of Fourth Amendment
  • stating that a parent “is not permitted to ignore the order and unilaterally institute measures [the parent] feels appropriate instead of the order”
  • stating that a parent “is not permitted to ignore the order and unilaterally institute measures [the parent] feels appropriate instead of the order”
  • addressing the Fourth Amendment’s application to the mandatory submission of blood in child custody cases and citing United States v. Int’l Bus. Machines Corp., 83 F.R.D. 97, 103 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Elliott, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.