Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/23/2002
Luminella v. Marcocci
Citations
- 814 A.2d 711
- 2002 Pa. Super. 410
- 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3897
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, a provision in child custody order requiring mother to undergo random drug testing did not violate reasonableness requirement of Fourth Amendment
- stating that a parent “is not permitted to ignore the order and unilaterally institute measures [the parent] feels appropriate instead of the order”
- stating that a parent “is not permitted to ignore the order and unilaterally institute measures [the parent] feels appropriate instead of the order”
- addressing the Fourth Amendment’s application to the mandatory submission of blood in child custody cases and citing United States v. Int’l Bus. Machines Corp., 83 F.R.D. 97, 103 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hudock, Elliott, Olszewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jackson v. BeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-14· cited 189×
- Mikhail v. KahnE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-01-13· cited 114×
- Johns v. CiociSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-30· cited 81×
- Kaull v. KaullAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-12-22· cited 25×
- Fox v. GarzilliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-13· cited 18×
- In the Interest of A.C. and A.J., Minor Children, J.C., FatherCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-07-16· cited 7×
- In re T.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-12-03· cited 5×
- Snyder v. WylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-05· cited 4×
- J.R. Regula v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-06
- In the Interest of: D.R., Appeal of: D.R. and J.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-26
- In the Interest of: D.R. Appeal of: CYS, No. 45 WAP 2019 In the Interest of: A.R. Appeal of: CYS -No. 46 WAP 2019 In the Interest of: G.R. Appeal of: CYS- No. 47 WAP 2019 In the Interest of: R.R. Appeal of: CYS-No. 48 WAP 2019 In the Interest of: C.R. Appeal of: CYSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-06-16
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 1,234×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- In Re B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 150×
- McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-28· cited 137×
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1979-06-25· cited 76×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 69×
- Alfred v. BraxtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-07· cited 65×
- Goodman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-06· cited 49×
- In re T.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-23· cited 41×
- Flannery v. IbertiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-01· cited 28×
- Rekeweg v. Federal Mutual InsuranceN.D. Indiana· 1961-02-24· cited 19×
- Watters v. WattersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-07· cited 16×
- Boylan v. BoylanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-18· cited 12×
- Loyal Eugene Blair v. Supreme Court of the State of WyomingTenth Circuit· 1982-02-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.