In re T.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that juvenile court has discretion as part of its dispositional powers under the Juvenile Act to direct a parent to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation before placing a delinquent child with the parent
• holding that juvenile court has discretion as part of its dispositional powers under the Juvenile Act to direct a parent to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation before placing a delinquent child with the parent
• holding that juvenile court has discretion as part of its dispositional powers under the Juvenile Act to direct a parent to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation before placing a delinquent child with the parent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Int. of: J.M., Appeal of: L.M.-M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-13· cited 51×
• In the Interest of: N.A.D., Appeal of: N.A.D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-03-05· cited 16×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re B.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 150×
• In the Interest of L.A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-22· cited 58×
• In re T.R.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-23· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Solomon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-22· cited 38×
• Luminella v. Marcocci
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-23· cited 32×
• In the Interest of J.F.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-08-10· cited 29×
• In the Interest of D.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-10-05· cited 7×