Lumex, Inc. v. Highsmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that information with regard to prototypes of new and future products, including manufacturing costs and pricing structure, sales training, projected release dates and projected life span was entitled to trade secret protection
• forbidding the use of confidential information defined as including customer lists and customer usages
• finding Defendant would inevitably disclose trade secrets because Defendant intended to work for a direct competitor of his former employer in a similar capacity to his former job

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).