· 11/16/1992
Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. v. Roger J. Morris, Dr.
Citations
- 976 F.2d 1189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deferring to the parties’ choice of law where neither state had a materially greater interest in the controversy than the other
- stating without discussion that Missouri applies the Restatement (Second)'s choice of law provisions
- although it was “far from clear” that there was interest in or the possibility of transfer of technology, limited permanent injunction against disclosure of trade secrets was properly entered
- “We are convinced that Ernst, the most recent Missouri case, represents the best evidence of Missouri law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.