Skip to main content
· 11/16/1992

Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. v. Roger J. Morris, Dr.

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 1189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to the parties’ choice of law where neither state had a materially greater interest in the controversy than the other
  • stating without discussion that Missouri applies the Restatement (Second)'s choice of law provisions
  • although it was “far from clear” that there was interest in or the possibility of transfer of technology, limited permanent injunction against disclosure of trade secrets was properly entered
  • “We are convinced that Ernst, the most recent Missouri case, represents the best evidence of Missouri law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.