Commercial Cabinet Co. v. Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \[a] plaintiff who proves a right to damages without proving the amount as well is only entitled to nominal damages\
• explaining that “[a] plaintiff who proves a right to damages without proving the amount as well is only entitled to nominal damages”
• stating that the district court must make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law under NRCP 52(a)
• remanding case when the district court’s failure to make specific findings prevented effective review of the propriety of the award
• remanding case when the district court's failure to make specific findings prevented effective review of the propriety of the award
• remanding the matter when the record did not clearly support the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).