Skip to main content

Lowry v. State

Citations

  • 768 A.2d 688
  • 363 Md. 357
  • 2001 Md. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding conviction where officer stopped driver for failing to obey a proper traffic control device and subsequently administered a breath test
  • missing evidence instruction “generally” need not be given; it is usually sufficient to allow defendant to argue for negative inference against government regarding missing evidence during closing
  • “ ‘[T]he opposing side also has an opportunity to refute the argument and counter with reasons why the inference is inappropriate.’ ” (quoting Davis v. State, 333 Md. 27, 52, 633 A.2d 867, 879-80 (1993))
  • party may argue missing evidence inference to jury, but is not entitled to instruction
  • law \specifies circumstances where an individual is required to take an alcohol concentration test\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.