Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/27/1988

Lowry v. Lowry

Citations

544 A.2d 972
375 Pa. Super. 382
1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[T]he appropriateness of using an inflation factor [to offset interest discounts] is completely dependent on the terms of the individual pension at issue.”
“[T]he holding of Kaczkowski is simply inapplicable to present valuation of pensions which do not by their own terms account for inflation.”
“Since deferred distribution does not contemplate a present - 15 - J-A22013-21 distribution of assets, no present value of the pension need be calculated”
“[T]he holding of Kaczkowski is simply inapplicable to present -3- J-A27014-14 valuation of pensions which do not by their own terms account for inflation.”
proceeds from sale of jointly held stock was marital property, subject to equitable distribution
in equitably distributing pension benefits, coverture fraction must be applied so that only the portion of the pension that was acquired during marriage is subject to distribution; explains how coverture fraction is determined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Kelly, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.