Skip to main content
· 11/4/1994

Paulone v. Paulone

Citations

  • 649 A.2d 691
  • 437 Pa. Super. 130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the use of the coverture fraction and adopting an accrued benefits test for the distribution of a defined contribution plan
  • rejecting the use of the coverture-fraction method where the marital portion of husband's defined contribution plan was the difference between the value of the plan at the date of the marriage and value of the plan at the date of the separation
  • rejecting the use of the coverture-fraction method where the marital portion of husband's defined contribution plan was the difference between the value of the plan at the date of the marriage and value of the plan at the date of the separation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Elliott, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.