Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/9/1986

Bold v. Bold

Citations

516 A.2d 741
358 Pa. Super. 7
1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

using date of distribution when new appraisal was more credible and there was no evidence of waste or dissipation
using date of distribution when new appraisal was more credible and there was no evidence of waste or dissipation
valuation of husband's pension based on wife’s expert report was proper where husband did not demonstrate that such valuation was erroneous
a trial court granting a divorce may not resort to a buy-out remedy absent specific findings, on record, as to why the marital property could not be divided
inheritance considered marital property when it is comingled in a joint account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Wieand, Sole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.