Love v. Common School District No. 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improvements between two valuation times can be basis for excluding earlier property valuation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Freeman
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1968-04-23· cited 67×
• Vine Street Corporation v. City of Council Bluffs
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-07-31· cited 38×
• Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-07-13· cited 37×
• In Re Estate of Bernatzki
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1969-11-08· cited 34×
• Mesecher v. Cropp
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-01-26· cited 25×
• Humphries v. State Highway Commission
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-06-08· cited 19×
• City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 19×
• Mooney v. City of Overland Park
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-23· cited 19×
• Urban Renewal Agency v. Tate
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-05-07· cited 14×
• Kansas City Mall Associates, Inc. v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-16· cited 13×
• Mettee v. Urban Renewal Agency
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-01-26· cited 6×
• Jackson v. Pressnell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-20· cited 4×
• Urban Renewal Agency v. Spines
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-12-07· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1915-05-08· cited 42×
• Steck v. City of Wichita
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1956-04-07· cited 24×
• Cline v. Kansas Gas & Electric Company
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-12-07· cited 19×
• Emery v. Riverside Drainage District
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1931-01-10· cited 4×