Loustalot v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that while “more substantial alteration of the claims can” require republication, “alteration of the class period, without more, does not require republication”
• finding that republication of notice was warranted where the first-filed complaint included an original class period of only nine days and the consolidated class-action complaint expanded that period by more than two years and added new claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).