· 6/1/1984
Lounsbury v. Yorro
Citations
- 464 N.E.2d 866
- 124 Ill. App. 3d 745
- 80 Ill. Dec. 1
- 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1892
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the trial court did not err in sustaining an objection to comment in plaintiff’s counsel’s closing argument regarding an inapplicable standard of proof
- finding the trial court did not err in sustaining an objection to comment in plaintiff’s counsel’s closing argument regarding an inapplicable standard of proof
- finding the trial court did not err in sustaining an objection to comment in plaintiff’s counsel’s closing argument regarding an inapplicable standard of proof
- noting, a court must instruct the jury on - 20 - all issues reasonably presented by the evidence
- an objection to argument by counsel that is inconsistent with the jury instructions is properly sustained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lindberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.