Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/8/1992

Burns v. Michelotti

Citations

604 N.E.2d 1144
237 Ill. App. 3d 923
178 Ill. Dec. 621
1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

imposing a very light \sanction\ in view of the \minimal nature of the contact in question and its lack of relevance to the substance of the case\
finding any ex parte communication between defense counsel and treating physician, regardless of what information is actually revealed, to be improper and sanctionable, although where communication is of de minimis nature a court may refuse to impose sanctions in its discretion
finding any ex parte communication between defense counsel and treating physician, regardless of what information is actually revealed, to be improper and sanctionable, although where communication is of de minimis nature a court may refuse to impose sanctions in its discretion
“In presenting their arguments to the jury, counsel may state what they believe the law to be as long as their remarks are not misleading.”
“In presenting their arguments to the jury, counsel may state what they believe the law to be as long as their remarks are not misleading.”
“In presenting their arguments to the jury, counsel may state what they believe the law to be as long as their remarks are not misleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.