Louis Vadino v. A. Valey Engineers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a claim “which rested on interpretations of the underlying CBA must be resolved pursuant to the procedures contemplated under the Labor Management Relations Act” (“LMRA”)
• holding that FLSA claims dependent on CBA interpretation must be resolved through LMRA
• noting that under these circumstances, the resolution of an employee's FLSA claim \would be dependent upon the resolution in the ... contract interpretation issue\
• noting that under these circumstances, the resolution of an employee’s FLSA claim “would be dependent upon the resolution in the ... contract interpretation issue”
• recognizing supervisory authority to remand unexplained grants of summary judgment but reviewing decision de novo
• exercising supervisory power and requiring “the district courts in this circuit to accompany grants of summary judgment hereafter with an explanation sufficient to permit the parties and this court to understand the legal premise for the court’s order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).