McDonald v. City of West Branch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1738 does not apply to arbitration awards because arbitration is not a \judicial proceeding\
• holding that § 1738 does not apply to arbitration awards because arbitration is not a “judicial proceeding”
• holding that Sec. 1983 claims are nonarbitrable because arbitration \cannot provide an adequate substitute for a judicial proceeding\ in achieving Sec. 1983's objectives
• holding that § 1983 claims are nonarbitrable because arbitration “cannot provide an adequate substitute for a judicial proceeding” in achieving § 1983’s objectives
• holding that, in a federal discrimination suit, the court should not afford collateral estoppel effect to an arbitration award rendered pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement
• holding that “an award in an arbitration proceeding brought pursuant to the terms of a collective- bargaining agreement” does not have preclusive effect in a subsequent Section 1983 action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).