Skip to main content
M.D. Alabama· 8/27/2015

Loucks v. Smith (In re Smith)

Citations

  • 537 B.R. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employee fired after making an EEOC complaint met the section 523(a)(6) burden for a denial of discharge as “[a]llegations of . . . retaliation . . . encompass the elements for willful and malicious injury”
  • concluding that employee fired after making an EEOC complaint met the section 523(a)(6) burden for a denial of discharge as “[a]llegations of . . . retaliation . . . encompass the elements for willful and malicious injury”
  • “Vicarious liability, without more, cannot form the basis for a determination that [the debtor’s] conduct was ‘willful’ within the meaning of § 523(a)(6).”
  • “Allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress encompass the elements for willful and malicious injury.”
  • “Allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress encompass the elements for willful and malicious injury.”
  • “Ordinarily, federal appellate 8 courts will not consider issues not properly raised in the trial 9 courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.