Eleventh Circuit· 1/4/1994

Loranger v. Stierheim

Citations

10 F.3d 776
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

approving an across-the- board percentage cut to either the total number of hours claimed or to the lodestar amount
placing burden on fee applicant to support request with sufficient detail
“Where fee documentation is voluminous ... an hour-by- hour review is simply impractical and a waste of judicial resources.”
“Neither the district judge’s [two-year] delay [in ruling], nor his adverse rulings, constitute the sort of ‘pervasive bias’ that necessitates recusal.”
“Neither the district judge’s delay, nor his adverse rulings, constitute the sort of ‘pervasive bias’ that necessitates recusal.”
“[I]t is sufficient for the court to provide a concise but clear explanation of its reasons for the reduction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.