Zelaya/Capital International Judgment, LLC v. John Zelaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “jury trial [under § 77.08] is not required . . . if it would serve no purpose”
• observing that “post judgment statutory interest stops accruing once the disputed funds are deposited into the court’s registry”
• reviewing under an abuse-of-discretion standard the district court’s order allowing judgment debtor to deposit disputed funds into the court’s registry
• applying Florida garnishment law to case originating in Florida district court
• “[f]ederal courts regularly issue satisfactions of judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5).....Zamani_y. Carnes, 491 F.3d 990, 995 (9th Cir.2007) (‘Rule 60(b)(5
• \The federal courts . . . have overwhelmingly held that post[-]judgment statutory interest stops accruing once the disputed funds are deposited into the court's registry.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).