Skip to main content

Lopez v. State

Citations

  • 86 S.W.3d 228
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 188
  • 2002 WL 31186455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that trial court abuses its discretion if its ruling lies outside zone of reasonable disagreement
  • providing that trial court abuses its discretion if its ruling lies outside zone of reasonable disagreement
  • explaining that trial court does not abuse its discretion if its ruling is within zone of reasonable disagreement
  • reasoning that trial court stands in position to determine whether a prior statement is inconsistent
  • reasoning that trial court stands in position to determine whether a prior statement is inconsistent
  • to qualify for admission under Rule 613(a), the court must first “be persuaded that the statements are indeed inconsistent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.