Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/2/1989
Loomer v. M.R.T. Flying Service, Inc.
Citations
- 558 A.2d 103
- 384 Pa. Super. 244
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding ambiguous provisions are to be interpreted so as to provide maximum coverage to the insured
- stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
- stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
- “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous ... [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”
- “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous . . . [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Olszewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiThird Circuit· 2004-12-28· cited 161×
- Williams v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-12· cited 126×
- St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company v. Barbara LewisThird Circuit· 1991-07-24· cited 99×
- American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-21· cited 77×
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-25· cited 65×
- Hunyady v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-30· cited 25×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ShoemakerE.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-06-11· cited 19×
- Lexington Insurance v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaFirst Circuit· 2003-08-04· cited 15×
- Devcon International Corp. v. Reliance InsuranceThird Circuit· 2010-06-08· cited 13×
- Giancristoforo v. Mission Gas & Oil Products, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-10-24· cited 10×
- Serino v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaM.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-09-18· cited 7×
- PENNSYLVANIA NAT. MUTUAL CAS. INS. CO. v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-06· cited 3×
- Pecorara v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-30· cited 2×
- Progressive Insurance v. GlennDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-07-27· cited 2×
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Traveler's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-06· cited 1×
- Martirosov v. Shenandoah Flight Services, Inc.Rockingham County Circuit Court· 2004-03-02· cited 1×
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. LewisThird Circuit· 1991-06-27· cited 1×
- Lexington Insurance Company v. General Accident Insurance Company of AmericaFirst Circuit· 2003-08-04
- JC Penney Life Ins v. PilosiThird Circuit· 2004-12-28
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. SosdorfE.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-07-18
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 700×
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court· 1953-01-28· cited 119×
- Timbrook v. Foremost InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-10· cited 51×
- Koval v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-14· cited 48×
- Musisko v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-19· cited 26×
- DiFabio v. Centaur InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-06· cited 25×
- Paul Revere Life Insurance Company v. First National Bank in Dallas, Administrator of the Estate of Loy Thomas Brown, DeceasedFirst Circuit· 1966-03-31· cited 18×
- Morgan v. Continental Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-18· cited 18×
- Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co.N.D. Texas· 1981-02-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.