Skip to main content
· 5/2/1989

Loomer v. M.R.T. Flying Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 558 A.2d 103
  • 384 Pa. Super. 244
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding ambiguous provisions are to be interpreted so as to provide maximum coverage to the insured
  • stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
  • stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
  • “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous ... [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”
  • “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous . . . [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.