· 5/2/1989
Loomer v. M.R.T. Flying Service, Inc.
Citations
- 558 A.2d 103
- 384 Pa. Super. 244
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding ambiguous provisions are to be interpreted so as to provide maximum coverage to the insured
- stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
- stating that construction of an insurance policy is a question of law
- “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous ... [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”
- “Where the terms of the insurance contract are not ambiguous . . . [the] Court must read the policy in its entirety and give the words therein their plain and proper meanings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Olszewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.