Skip to main content
· 6/11/1997

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Shoemaker

Citations

  • 965 F. Supp. 700
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8462
  • 1997 WL 321753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a granddaughter’s “temporary but nonetheless principal employment of her grandmother’s car” on a daily basis over a three-week period qualified as “regular use”
  • identifying “(1) blanket permission to use the car . . . and (2) an available set of keys” as “two important indicia of regular use”
  • noting insurance policy provision language stating that “ ‘[f]umished for regular use does not include a motor vehicle rented from a rental company for less than 28 days’ ”
  • “Where courts have had difficulty is not in the definition of the term [‘regular use’], but in its application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Louis H. Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.