Skip to main content
· 10/6/1987

DiFabio v. Centaur Insurance

Citations

  • 531 A.2d 1141
  • 366 Pa. Super. 590
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that ambiguous terms are subject to “more than one interpretation when applied to a particular set of facts”
  • explaining that ambiguous terms are subject to \more than one interpretation when applied to a particular set of facts\
  • in determining whether an insurance policy is ambiguous, “the court must assess the writing as a whole and not in discrete units”
  • “The threshold determination of whether a writing is ‘ambiguous’ necessarily lies with the court.”
  • contracts may not be interpreted in discrete units

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Kelly, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.