Loomer v. Dionne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that only a case of “gross negligence” will preclude a plaintiff from taking advantage of ch. 260, § 32
• an action commenced in the wrong court is “duly commenced” and, if dismissed for that reason, has been dismissed for a “matter of form” within the meaning of G.L.c. 260, §32, so as to permit re-filing within one year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).