Krasnow v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding knowledge of harm was sufficient to initiate further inquiry into whether defendant was a Commonwealth employee for the purpose of presentment requirement
• “Massachusetts does not require discovery of each of the elements of the cause of action — duty, breach, causation, and damages before the limitation clock . . . starts ticking”
• “The plaintiff’s knowledge was sufficient to stimulate further inquiry on his part about the claim, including inquiry into the facts about [the defendant’s] employment status, and, thus, to start the running of the clock.”
• “The discovery rule, however, is applicable to the presentment requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).