Skip to main content
· 11/1/2005

Corliss v. City of Fall River

Citations

  • 397 F. Supp. 2d 260
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26286
  • 2005 WL 2861387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction was a dismissal for a “matter of form” for purposes of the renewal statute
  • applying savings statute to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, which also borrow the state limitations period
  • applying Massachusetts law and holding that the renewal statute “cannot save any renewed claims against * * * unnamed and consequently unserved defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.