· 11/1/2005
Corliss v. City of Fall River
Citations
- 397 F. Supp. 2d 260
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26286
- 2005 WL 2861387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction was a dismissal for a “matter of form” for purposes of the renewal statute
- applying savings statute to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, which also borrow the state limitations period
- applying Massachusetts law and holding that the renewal statute “cannot save any renewed claims against * * * unnamed and consequently unserved defendants”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.