Long's Estate
Citations
- 39 Pa. Super. 323
- 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 487
Syllabus
<p>Wills — Vested and contingent estates — Construction—Children.</p> <p>1. In cases of doubtful construction the law leans in favor of an absolute, rather than a defeasible estate; of a vested, rather than a contingent one; of the primary, rather than the secondary intent; of the first, rather than the second taker, as the principal object of the testator’s bounty; and of a distribution as nearly conformed to the general rules of inheritance as possible.</p> <p>2. The question of vested or contingent is not to be tested by the certainty or uncertainty of obtaining the actual enjoyment; for that would make the character of the estate depend, not upon the terms of its creation, but on the form of the result. Neither does it depend upon the defeasibility or indefeasibility of the right of possession; for many estates are vested without possession, as well as with, which are yet defeasible. If there is a present right to a future possession, though that right may be defeated by some future event, contingent or certain, there is nevertheless a vested estate. An unpossessed estate is vested, if it is certain to take effect in possession, by enduring longer than the precedent estate.</p> <p>3. In Pennsylvania a person sui juris owning a contingent interest in land or in personal property, may sell the same to one who does not stand towards him in a trust relation and who does not impose upon him, for any sum agreed upon between them.</p> <p>4. It is the well established rule of construction in this state, as well as elsewhere, that the word “ children ” in a will does not include grandchildren, unless it appears from the context to have been so intended by the testator, or such meaning is necessary to carry out his manifest intent.</p> <p>5. Testator gave all the residue of his estate, real and personal, to a trustee in trust for the period of twenty years with large and ample powers in the trustee to manage, invest and reinvest the same. He also directed as follows: “ I
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McClure's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1873-05-17· cited 49×
- Estate of WengerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-10-05· cited 32×
- Manderson v. LukensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1854-07-01· cited 26×
- Provenchere's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1871-02-20· cited 24×
- Appeal of ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-01-03· cited 23×
- In re Estate of JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-01-04· cited 21×
- Estate of HuntLehigh County Orphans' Court· 1890-03-17· cited 17×
- Amelia Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1853-07-01· cited 16×
- Letchworth's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 16×
- Roland v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1882-04-17· cited 14×
- Roberts's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1868-05-18· cited 12×
- Phillips's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-05-04· cited 11×
- Mellon v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-11-05· cited 10×
- Thomman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-05-07· cited 10×
- Schriver v. CobeauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1835-05-15· cited 8×
- Appeal of LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-10-03· cited 7×
- McCall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1878-02-18· cited 6×
- Appeal of McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-10-03· cited 6×
- Appeal of SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-03-19· cited 6×
- Appeal of RyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-03-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.