Skip to main content
· 3/17/1890

Estate of Hunt

Citations

  • 133 Pa. 260
  • 19 A. 548
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 898

Syllabus

<p>1. Grandchildren can be included in the term, “ children,” in a will, in but two cases : (a) when the will would be inoperative unless the sense of the term “children” were extended beyond its natural import; and (b) where the testator has clearly shown by other words that he did not intend to use the term in its proper, actual sense.</p> <p>(a) A testator directed by his will that his residuary estate should be divided among the persons legally entitled to it under the intestate laws, but, by a codicil, he provided as follows: “All my personal estate .....shall be divided equally between my wife.....and all my children, share and share alike.”</p> <p>(b) On the margin of the will and codicil, opposite each paragraph, were brief explanatory notes in red ink, and opposite the codicil was written as follows: “Personal estate to be equally divided among all the heirs.” The testator left to survive him a widow, children, and the daughter of a deceased child:</p> <p>2. In such case, the distribution directed by the will must give way to that provided by the codicil; the gift to the children was confined by the codicil to children in the proper sense, and this construction was unaffected by the use by the testator of the word “ heirs ” in the marginal note.</p>

Judges: Clark, Geeen, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.